The Battle for Earth (Outline): The Good-Evil Index; The Amazing Feature of the Good-Evil Index; The Many Concurrent Battles to Take Over Earth; Alien Invasion; Global Industrialization; Christianity and Islam; Judaism; The Illuminati; The Great White Brotherhood / Universal Brotherhood; Foundation

 

© 2005 Joseph George Caldwell.  All rights reserved.  Posted at Internet web sites http://www.foundation.bw and http://www.foundationwebsite.org .  May be copied or reposted for non-commercial use, with attribution.  (13 January 2005)

 

 

Contents

 

The Good-Evil Index. 1

The Amazing Feature of the Good-Evil Index. 6

The Many Concurrent Battles to Take Over Earth. 8

Alien Invasion. 11

Global Industrialization. 16

Christianity and Islam.. 16

Judaism.. 16

The Illuminati 16

The Great White Brotherhood / Universal Brotherhood. 16

Foundation. 17

 

 

The Good-Evil Index

 

A couple of months ago, Transparency International (TI) released the 2004 version of its Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI).  You can view a copy of this at the Internet website http://www.transparency.org/pressreleases_archive/2004/2004.10.20.cpi.en.html .  The CPI provides a measure of the perceived level of corruption in each of 146 countries of the world.  The best is Finland, and the worst are Bangladesh and Haiti.

 

Many people are aware of the TI CPI since, each year, many news services report on it, identifying some of the best and worst countries in the world.  This year, the Index caught my eye twice – first in the general new release, but second, in an article written in a local paper by editorialist Roy Clarke.  Zambia, where I currently live, was rated in the 11-th worst category, and Clarke wrote a very funny satire on this fact.  I reported on this in my article, “Roy Clarke on Corruption” in Miscellany8.

 

As you know, I am very concerned with the state of the planet, and would like to see a rational planetary management system established, before the mass species extinction currently underway goes to full term and the biosphere is totally destroyed.  After seeing the reports on the CPI, the issue of corruption of the world’s countries – the political leaders and the leaders of business and industry – ruminated in my mind for some time.  It is very clear that most of the leaders in today’s world are corrupt.  They are genuinely evil people who are quite willing to sacrifice the biosphere and the quality of living for mankind for all time, simply to generate wealth and power for themselves or their particular groups (family, tribe, nation, race, species) in their brief lifetimes.

 

On some reflection, it occurred to me that it would be useful to construct a more general index of behavior, that reflected not just behavior of countries relative to economic corruption, but also the behavior relative to destruction of the planet’s biosphere.  I would call this index the “Good-Evil Index,” or GEI.  The issue that then arose was what components should be reflected in this index.  On further reflection, it appeared to me that (as observed by Forrest Gump) “evil is as evil does,” and that I should try to capture an indicator (or indicators) that reflect various countries’ actions relative to destroying the biosphere.  There are so many areas in which mankind is ravaging the environment, however, that this did not appear to be a very practical approach.  Man is polluting the atmosphere, the oceans, the land, the rivers, the lakes.  He is destroying all old-growth forests.  He is destroying habitat of wild species at a horrific rate.  He is causing global warming.  He is causing the sixth mass species extinction, with the loss of an estimated 30,000 species per year.  Through the development of civilization, he is causing untold misery to his own species, via overcrowding, poverty, disease, slavery, war, and a destroyed environment.  There is simply too much to look at, if you try to measure the extent of mankind’s destruction of the planet.

 

So, what I needed was one or more indicators that reflect the problem, not its multifarious effects.  At that point, it occurred to me, as I have observed many times, that, in the final analysis, it is mankind’s massive numbers that is destroying the planet.  From this point of view, the countries that are doing the most damage are those that have the greatest population density relative to “productive” land, and those that have the greatest growth rates.  (I decided that there was little point to including energy-related indicators, such as energy consumption per capita or per-capita income or the World Bank Human Development Index, since it appears that all countries strive to use as much energy as they can.  Some, however, make much better (i.e., responsible, from a planetary management viewpoint) use of the energy than others.)

 

While writing Can America Survive? I assembled many of these kinds of statistics.  In particular, I had figures for 229 countries, on population, population growth rate, arable land, permanent cropland, cropland (= arable land + permanent cropland), permanent pasture, agricultural land (= cropland + permanent pasture), forest and woodland, and productive land (=agricultural land + forest and woodland).  The data were mainly from World Bank publications.  The population figures were for 1996, and the population growth rate was for the period 1990-95.  (Later figures are available, but I have not been engaged in working with data for some time, and these are the latest that I have right now on my computer.)  The land-use figures were for 1993.  I calculated the population density (the ratio of population to productive land) using the 1996 population divided by the 1993 “productive land” value.

 

These figures are shown in the table below.  The table includes the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index (TICPI04), the population growth rate (AGR9095WB), and the population density relative to productive land (DensProd96).  To form a simple index of good-evil, I simply ranked each country relative to each of these three indicators (the ranks have suffix “I” attached, summed the ranks, and ranked the summed ranks.  This final value is the Good-Evil Index (GoodEvilIndex).

 

Country

TICPI04

TICPI04I

DensProd96

DensProd96I

AGR9095WB

AGR9095WBI

SumOfRanks

GoodEvilIndex

Finland

9.7

146

0.1981

123

0.47

118

387

1

Sweden

9.2

141

0.282

116

0.52

116

373

2

New Zealand

9.6

145

0.1473

128

0.98

99

372

3

Iceland

9.5

143

0.1125

133

1.15

91

367

4

Suriname

4.3

97

0.0286

143

0.24

125

365

5

Estonia

6

115

0.4215

108

-0.39

142

365

6

Australia

8.8

138

0.0303

142

1.33

85

365

7

Canada

8.5

135

0.0528

140

1.18

89

364

8

Uruguay

6.2

119

0.2033

122

0.54

113

354

9

Norway

8.9

139

0.4689

101

0.52

114

354

10

Ireland

7.5

129

0.6112

96

0.52

115

340

11

United States

7.5

130

0.372

111

0.99

98

339

12

Spain

7.1

124

0.8518

80

0.09

131

335

13

Latvia

4

89

0.4652

102

-0.53

143

334

14

Lithuania

4.6

101

0.6783

89

0.03

135

325

15

Bulgaria

4.1

93

0.8358

82

-0.53

144

319

16

Chile

7.4

127

0.4197

109

1.56

81

317

17

Slovenia

6

116

1.0596

66

0.07

132

314

18

Portugal

6.3

120

1.3603

54

-0.09

139

313

19

Denmark

9.5

144

1.6526

45

0.28

123

312

20

Russian Federation

2.8

51

0.1494

127

0.09

130

308

21

Hungary

4.8

105

1.2912

56

-0.66

145

306

22

Austria

8.4

133

1.2043

60

0.69

110

303

23

France

7.1

125

1.2934

55

0.48

117

297

24

Belarus

3.3

71

0.6297

94

0.22

126

291

25

United Kingdom

8.6

136

2.9971

30

0.3

122

288

26

Brazil

3.9

88

0.2235

120

1.59

80

288

27